Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2002 14:14:19 -0700 From: John Carpenter Statement of problem: A key goal of our project is to quantify the observational characteristics of disks (as traced by the IRAC, MIPS, and low-res spectra) and determine how these characteristics evolve in time. The observed characteristics will map, in a manner to be determined, the physical properties of disks (composition, spatial structure, frequency) and ultimately the diversity and evolution of planetary systems. Rather than focus on explaining the observed properties of every individual star in our sample, it will be informative to quantify the mean and dispersion in the observed disk characteristics as a function of stellar properties (primarily age), and to then interpret the broad trends within the data. The analysis can be broken down into 3 steps: (1) quantify the disk characteristics based on the SEDS and low-res spectra; (2) determine how these characteristics correlate (if at all) with stellar properties; (3) interpret any broad trends with the physical models developed by our group. This abstract deals mainly with quantifying the observed disk characteristics and looking for trends with the data itself (steps 1 and 2). Method of Attack It is not clear to me yet what is the appropriate metric to quantify the the disk properties, but I have some ideas. The simplest, but inadequate, measure is the fraction of stars that have an 24um excess. This will be looked at certainly, but that alone does not fully exploit the data. Instead one should be able to group the data by the shape of the SEDS and the spectral features. This is usually done by visual inspection of the data, but I believe it is worth exploring more quantitative measures so that the observations can be readily compared with our models. Specifically this analysis seems well suited for principal component techniques which will identify any groups inherent in the data. Required data This project will require the IRAC, MIPS, and low-res spectra, and also Martin's models in order to remove the underlying stellar photosphere. I do not see a need at first to make a distinction between "post-accretion" and "debris" disks, and it would be vastly preferable to analyze all feps targets together. In that manner, any differences between young post-accretion disks and old debris disks will fall out of the analysis, and in an ideal world, we would be able to make a quantitative distinction between the two. Duration This is a long-term project. In the short term, one can explore and fine-tune the analysis techniques on the theoretical models before SIRTF launch, and then optimize the analysis once real data starts coming in. In the long term I foresee a paper that will run a global analysis on all stars in our sample and analyze the data on a purely empirical basis. A separate paper, probably led by one of the modelers on our team, would interpret any broad trends that are identified. Level of commitment High List of co-investigators I have yet to discuss this abstract with anyone, but I would suspect Meyer (?), Hillenbrand (?), Backman (?) and others would be interested.