Next: Summary and Future Directions
Up: Discussion
Previous: The Origin of the
The high excitation level of the brighter knots around MR 2251-178 (e.g.,
[Bergeron et al. 1983]; [Nørgaard-Nielsen et al. 1986]; [Macchetto et al. 1990]) requires an energetic
source of ionization. In-situ ionization by a faint hot stellar
component is unlikely to be dominant for a number of reasons. Deep
broadband imagery of MR 2251-178 reveals a morphology very unlike that of our
narrowband observations. The R-band image of Hutchings et al. (1999)
exhibits a faint component extended along the N-S direction, markedly
different from the symmetric spiral pattern that we observe in H
.
Moreover, Hutchings et al. (1999) do not detect an excess of continuum
emission at the locations of any of the brighter H
knots in the
envelope. Perhaps even more damaging to the stellar ionization
scenario is our detection of a large amount of diffuse ionized gas
outside of the brighter knots. We therefore favor an external source
of ionization.
The presence of a significant amount of ionized gas at large angles
relative to the jet axis (PA
;
[Macchetto et al. 1990]) seems
to rule out ionization mechanisms directly associated with the quasar
jet (e.g., shocks). We are therefore left with the possibility that
the ionization of the nebula is sustained by the quasar radiation
field. As described in detail in previous studies (e.g.,
[Bergeron et al. 1983]; [Nørgaard-Nielsen et al. 1986]; [Macchetto et al. 1990]), the power radiated by
the quasar can easily account for the high ionization level of the
nebula. However, the relative symmetry of the envelope requires that
the ionizing radiation is escaping the quasar symmetrically with
respect to our line of sight. The large-scale radiation field from
MR 2251-178 therefore shows no sign of anisotropy or alignment with the radio
axis, contrary to expectations from unified models of active galactic
nuclei that rely on orientation effects (e.g., [Barthel 1989]; [Antonucci 1993];
[Urry & Padovani 1995]). This symmetry of the radiation field, if typical of all
quasars, may have important consequences on our understanding of the
impact that quasars have on the intergalactic environment (e.g.,
proximity effect of Ly
clouds; [Carswell et al. 1982]; [Murdoch et al. 1986]).